‘Modi Doesn’t Need US Support’: How Mary Millben And Abhijeet Dipke’s War Of Words Escalated - The Logical Indian
‘Modi Doesn’t Need US Support’: How Mary Millben And Abhijeet Dipke’s War Of Words Escalated - The Logical Indian
摘要: Skip to content
AI-Generated
‘Modi Doesn’t Need US Support’: How Mary Millben And Abhijeet Dipke’s War Of Words Escalated
Mary Millben accuse
正文
Skip to content
AI-Generated
‘Modi Doesn’t Need US Support’: How Mary Millben And Abhijeet Dipke’s War Of Words Escalated
Mary Millben accuses CJP's Abhijeet Dipke of foreign funding as their public clash puts Modi and democratic dissent in focus.
Isha Deep
October 15, 2026
Supported by
American singer Mary Millben and Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) founder Abhijeet Dipke exchanged sharp statements on October 14, 2026, after Millben alleged that US-based donors opposed to Prime Minister Narendra Modi were funding Dipke and his political movement.
Dipke hit back, questioning why Modi would need American support to discredit Indian citizens and arguing that foreign nationals should not interfere in India’s internal affairs. Millben subsequently defended Modi, saying he did not need American support because he had the backing of Indian citizens, and urged Dipke to work with the Prime Minister instead.
The exchange unfolded amid protests by CJP and opposition groups demanding Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation over alleged irregularities in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls. However, the funding allegation remains unverified in the reporting reviewed, and no direct response from Modi or the Election Commission to this specific claim was identified.
The controversy has brought renewed attention to foreign influence, political dissent and the evidence required to substantiate allegations against a protest movement.
A Public Exchange
The confrontation began when
, an American singer known for her public support for Modi, posted allegations on X that Dipke and CJP were receiving money from US-based donors opposed to the Prime Minister. She claimed that the funding was connected to efforts to disrupt governance and undermine Modi’s leadership.
Calling on young Indians to take a stand, she urged them to peacefully oppose what she described as CJP’s disruptive activities. Dipke responded by questioning the in